Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The rest of us don't care. There are a handful of parks and Hearst is the one getting the upgrade. We want a pool and don't care exactly where it goes as long as it is closer than Frances and Jelleff. It is a NIMBY tactic to ask for [b]more studies[/b] and seek more delay before a project is realized. That playbook won't work here. Sorry. [/quote] More studies? There wasn't a single study. There's a reason why Mary Cheh became a professor at a second or third tier law school: she clearly doesn't know anything about calculating dimensions and plotting them on a graph paper site plan. A standard pool simply won't fit at Hearst without tearing out the field, the tennis courts and lots of trees -- probably some combination.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
