Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "How likely for save act to pass senate? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Supreme Court ruled this week that the USPS can decide not to deliver mail to people without recourse. So if the leadership decide not to deliver mail in ballots because people are black or democrats, it is totally legal. But sure, let's limit people's ability to vote because they got married and changed their name.[/quote] 1. Pretty sure that if they don't deliver ballots, there are other laws that would apply. [b]2. Quit claiming that married women will not be able to vote. That is a bogus accusation and it is getting tiresome.[/b] For some reason, it would appear that you do not want any limits on who can vote--i.e. you do not want people to prove their citizenship.[/quote] There is not one sentence in the law affirming a marriage certificate as adequate to prove a change name of a US citizen. Not bogus.[/quote] PROCESS IN CASE OF CERTAIN DISCREPANCIES IN DOCUMENTATION.—Subject to any relevant guidance adopted by the Election Assistance Commission, each State shall establish a process under which an applicant can provide such [b]additional documentation t[/b]o the appropriate election official of the State as may be necessary to establish that the applicant is a citizen of the United States in the event of a discrepancy with respect to the applicant’s documentary proof of United States citizenship[/quote] You keep forgetting the "subject to" part. Thus far, there is no additional guidance so everything is up in the air and some rando election official will decide on a case-by-case basis. Convenient isn't it? [/quote] You are really, really stretching this. Do you really think Democrats cannot win without illegal voting?[/quote] You are calling voting with you married name illegal. Thanks to Kansas for showing us what this is really about and how it will actually go down on election day.[/quote] Why can't you vote with your married name? OP says she has a passport. This is an ID that proves your citizenship and eligibility to vote. Your ballot is also under you rmarried name, I assume? [/quote] Because if you took your husband's name you are no longer voting under your birth name, they will flag the inconsistency, purge you from the voter rolls and deny you your vote.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics