Reply to Redshirting August boy?

Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools

Reply to "Redshirting August boy? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why would my redshirting affect anyone else's kid?  It is a decision made by me about what is in the best interests of my child.  Everyone is entitled to do the same.

This discussion has gone completely off the rails.[/quote]

Because the expectations change on what is expected of kids at specific grades.  How do you not get that.

Is it really best for your child that you basically change their age by a year?[/quote]

How do you not get my position - which is based on your same concerns?  So to allay your concerns, [b]my child with an August 15th birthday should go into first grade as a just-turned 6 yo with someone’s child that will turn 7 on October 1st?[/b]  And I am horrible to redshirt and have my DC wait a year so the two will be more evenly matched physically, emotionally and academically?  I’m not talking about redshirting a child born in April - literally redshirting a child born 6 weeks before cutoff.[/quote]

But where does it end? The child with the July birthday now has to go with your child who will be a year older than them. If the July child redshirts, now the June birthday will be the youngest. The only thing I have issue with is that it becomes an endless competition to not have the youngest child in the class. [/quote]

Ask the private school where your child is applying where it ends. They will have a crisp answer that aligns with their admissions policies.

Goodness. It is absolutely remarkable how many people in this thread do not have a basic grasp of private school admissions and how they work. [/quote]

It ends because not all children would benefit from being 1 year older. There are plenty of kids that for whatever reason are ready to go to school and be the youngest. Maybe because they have older siblings, maybe because they matured earlier, maybe because they are only children, maybe because they are girls… it does not matter why. Just how there are many reasons why some kids are not ready and would benefit from waiting 1 year, there are just as many kids who would be bored and would not gain anything from waiting 1 year.

That’s what is so great about giving parents the ability to choose. We know our kids best and we know what would benefit them the most. I redshirted my eldest DD form 6 days before cut off because she was immature, insecure and socially behind. I did not redshirt my second daughter because she was advanced in many ways, confident, independent and used to be around older kids.[/quote]

Or maybe  you had unrealistic ideas of what a five year old should look like.  No five year old should be mature.  [/quote]

Sounds like the anti-redshirting troll doesn’t even have kids. So clueless. 
[/quote]

Sounds like the person holding their kids back doesn't have a clue about child development.  K is meant for 5 year olds, not 6.[/quote]

Let it go. You're just a broken record spewing the same nonsense over and over.[/quote]

K. was created for 5 year olds.  [/quote]

Kindergarten in 1975 was for 5 year olds. 
[/quote]

And, yet, all those kids in 1975 did just fine starting at 5.  So, why is it for all of history of schools, its been age five and all of the sudden 5 year olds are not ready?[/quote]

It was half-day and they played and even napped.

Totally different. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics