Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Such a lengthy opinion when all they have to say is “because the Catholic Church is against abortion.”[/quote] +100000000 [b]And more appalling that these were judges appointed by presidents who lost the popular vote[/b]. [/quote] We are no longer a functional representative democracy. [/quote] We were never a functional representative democracy. Since the founding of this country, we've been ruled by a wealthy minority -- a minority that tells us to what to think, what to say, what to do, what to eat, where to work, etc.[/quote] That happens by consent. When the consent is no longer there, then things change. This country has changed a lot since its founding. Those of us who didn't sleep through school, or through any stories from family members or friends, know this. [/quote] +1 What people understand and were willing to believe has changed a lot. So far one thing I know to be true, the GOP doesn’t care about America or the women who live here. If they did: [twitter]https://twitter.com/nikobowie/status/1521307709127249920[/twitter][/quote] I don’t think they will change the filibuster but maybe Collins, Murkowski, and the Ds can whip up 60 votes to protect women? [/quote] Susan "but he promised me he'd uphold Roe" Collins???? LOLOLOL. [/quote] Time for her and others to step up to protect women. [/quote] The overwhelming majority of abortions are performed early in pregnancy. Why not pass a bill preserving access to abortions before 16 weeks (that is almost all of them).[/quote] Because it doesn’t solve the fact that this strikes at the rights of women to control their own bodies and lives, for one thing, and for another thing it doesn’t address the fact that many fetal anomalies are revealed at the 20 week scan and sometimes later, and sometimes women medically need to abort later for their own health. Abortion should be regulated like any other medical procedure, end of list. Which means that it would be available same day at your gyno’s office and covered by insurance instead of inter-state travel and a waiting period song and dance and paying out of pocket. Because it’s not about the abortion itself, which, again, [b][i]abortions will become more common if abortion is outlawed[/i][/b]. It’s about controlling women and causing them maximum pain. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics