Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can anyone who supports trump tell me why all of the sudden you are not ok blaming the victim? Don't say liberal hypocrisy. Tell me why this is so important to you now.[/quote] We were told last year that all women must be believed and questioning the victim is wrong. What changed?[/quote] Total BS. You’ve been told many times to drop the “all” and that unquestioning belief was never guaranteed. You were asked to come up with proof that “all” was widely used beyond the fringe and some actresses, and you came up with one Senator (who later phrased it differently) and a few posters by Senate staff. Have you no self-respect? Or are you doing this for money?[/quote] Here's a direct quote from one of the many threads about you-know-who a couple of years ago. 9/17/2018 "Again, such a level of backlash and intense scrutiny over every aspect of her life? No one except a truth-telling person would want to put themselves in that position. And among those, there are very few truth-telling persons who would actually go through with it. As the MeToo movement has shown, most victims still aren't ready to come out. It's too traumatizing to relive the even and have a number of people calling you names, tearing you apart and disbelieving you. Therefore I find the accuser credible." So let me ask you: why did you (or whoever wrote this, obviously someone you agree with) defend with such vigor that particular woman, but not Reade? We'll wait.[/quote] Easy. What pp said about changing her story more often than changing her name, defrauding a charity and lying in bankruptcy court. Also her complete lack of evidence (despite initially claiming she filed about the harassment) and problems with her supposed corroboration (her brother changing his story). You think we should now believe her despite all this? What a ridiculous straw man of a standard you’re trying to create here. [/quote] I see. And the accuser being spoken about in the PP didn't have huge gaps in her *own* story? And NO ONE who would corroborate it? And you're calling that a straw man? Nope. THAT'S the comparison here. That you would so completely believe one woman's weird, decades old story, with no facts, dates, witnesses, or places, but so completely disbelieve another woman's similarly hard to prove story? What's the only real difference between these women? The political parties of the accused. HYPOCRITE.[/quote] And you all who pshaw two dozen accusations against Trump aren’t hypocrites? OK.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics