Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do you all think that Christine’s parents or other family members will seek custody of the child? I know it will be hard for her to be moved now but she has been living with essentially an accessory after the fact to the crime, right? If Fairfax doesn’t prosecute Tess for anything related to the case, do Christine’s family have any chance of custody? Have they tried for custody ever in these years?[/quote] Maybe family member. Parents seem very old to take care of a kid. [/quote] And what do you think Tess is like? I envision an ogre 👹 plus the great grandmother lives with them in that house of horror! Christine has a sister. Her father testified and was quite coherent and composed facing that monster. Her mother will fight to the death for custody. [b]Former au pair will absolutely step in[/b]. She has posted a lot about Christine on Instagram. She’s devastated. From the pics she posted of her wedding, it appears that Christine was matron of honor and Valerie was flower girl. IIRC, they talked every week. I did not stalk her socials. Someone posted a link in Reddit. She’s a lovely girl. [/quote] I truly believe statements like this are wishful thinking. The former au pair, as lovely as she may be, may not be willing to adopt and raise a child for the next 10+ years, even if she loved that child in the past, especially considering she now hasn't seen that child for more than 2 years, the child hasn't seen her, and the child will likely have significant psychological support needs as she grows up. I think it's easy to look at these situations with rose colored glasses and say "her babysitter from when she was in diapers will surely adopt her, even though now she's an 8 year old and hasn't seen her in years". I wish that would happen too, but, the most realistic scenario is that BB's mom continues to have custody for the short term, and that CB's parents get custody for the long term if they apply for custody, IF the state can show that BB's mom is detrimental to her well being. But plenty of parents are detrimental to a child's well being, and the state reunifies them over and over again even if a more capable, kinder, more stable family member wants custody of that child. Since BB's mom has had her this whole time, taking custody away from BB's mom will likely not be easy if she isn't physically abusing her and if the child seems to be doing relatively well. I hope I'm wrong. I do think a judge will force BB's mom to allow CB's parents to see her, though, now that custody will be taken from BB I'm assuming. [/quote] But didn't his mom basically get it because Brendan gave it to her because he was the only living parent and hadn't been convicted? And now, he can be deemed an unfit parent, and then I guess she becomes a ward of the state until someone petitions for custody, which I presume both sets of grandparents will do? Anyone know the procedure?[/quote] I believe that yes, since BB had (and likely, at this moment, still does have) full legal custody of her, he can fully control who she stays with. If he loses legal custody, then the state will have to decide where she goes, but the default is going to be to keep her where she is unless there is abuse, neglect, etc. because that would be considered the least disruptive for the child. This situation obviously has extenuating circumstances given that the person who she has been with for the past couple of years (and ONLY with, the past 6+ months since BB went to jail) is the mother of the person who murdered her mother, but it's also one of her 4 closest living relatives, and if they currently have a strong bond and the child is well cared for... i don't know. It would be hard to say. I do know that being incarcerated does NOT automatically terminate your parental rights. An old friend of mine has a child with a man who is currently doing a 10 year jail sentence (long story involving mental illness that developed after their marriage- think severe bipolar or similar). She has full/primary physical custody but they still share legal custody, even though he is in jail and the court does not force my friend to allow the young child to visit the father in jail. This situation might be different though since it was murder and since he is likely going to get a life sentence. [/quote] I don't think he will lose parental rights because he's incarcerated, but surely, because he's convicted of child endangerment, specifically for murdering her mother with her in the house - it has to be enough, if there's any justice![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics