Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Realignment for SEC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We get it. You think ME offices suck and are a waste of time. Message received, loudly and repeatedly. But a lot of us in these offices are parents in this city and we read this forum too. Accountability is fair and we welcome it. There are efficiencies to find in every office, including everyone else's in this chat. But at some point relentless dismissal of entire teams isn't accountability, it's just punching at people (anonymously). The truth is there's a lot going on across ME offices that most people never see. Now can we please get back to asking questions or spreading rumors that could easily be answered or dispelled by doing a quick search of the Exchange or AskHR. [/quote] Don't waste your breath. The complaints about ME office and staff is obvious dog whistle by an individual lashing out at staff providing support to the mission but not necessarily executing the mission. You can't appease to these types because they do not have the cognitive ability to analyze complex issues of organizational management, program prioritization, local access to support staff knowledgeable on matters specific to their division and office, and other factors that matter in an organization as large as the SEC.[/quote] Ha! Or maybe it’s just common sense that the functions were performed just as well if not better only a few years ago with a quarter of the people and no ME as a senior officer position. But keep those time sheet and leave buyback emails coming. Need to keep people busy handling “complex issues of organizational management.”[/quote] What “complex organizational issues” are the supporters of these admins talking about? And I agree with another poster who said there used to be MEs who were competent. Not anymore. Like that person said, especially the last ENF ME and the current exams ME who came from other agencies - completely incompetent. Reduce the glut. Merge these ME offices back into OSO and OHR. Leave one business manager per division. An SK14, no higher. [/quote] Exactly! And from the stories out there, it sounds like competent as a hiring qualification has been replaced with vindictive for some of these MEs.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics