Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "How likely for save act to pass senate? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Supreme Court ruled this week that the USPS can decide not to deliver mail to people without recourse. So if the leadership decide not to deliver mail in ballots because people are black or democrats, it is totally legal. But sure, let's limit people's ability to vote because they got married and changed their name.[/quote] 1. Pretty sure that if they don't deliver ballots, there are other laws that would apply. [b]2. Quit claiming that married women will not be able to vote. That is a bogus accusation and it is getting tiresome.[/b] For some reason, it would appear that you do not want any limits on who can vote--i.e. you do not want people to prove their citizenship.[/quote] There is not one sentence in the law affirming a marriage certificate as adequate to prove a change name of a US citizen. Not bogus.[/quote] PROCESS IN CASE OF CERTAIN DISCREPANCIES IN DOCUMENTATION.—[b]Subject to any relevant guidance adopted by the Election Assistance Commission[/b], each State shall establish a process under which an applicant can provide such [b]additional documentation t[/b]o the appropriate election official of the State as may be necessary to establish that the applicant is a citizen of the United States in the event of a discrepancy with respect to the applicant’s documentary proof of United States citizenship[/quote] The first bolded makes the second irrelevant. Marriage certificate does bupkis unless a board that doesn’t currently exist eventually says it does. Zero protection for married women who changed their names.[/quote] LOL! You really think they are going to disenfranchise married women? Why would they want to do that?[/quote] Because women skew left. And LOL! You really think anything is off the table? We are about to send teenagers to die in the Middle East for Israel.[/quote] This is a bogus argument. In fact, it appears to be the only argument. Even Harris said that women would not be allowed to vote--which is an indicator of her cluelessness. But, since she did not change her name, she would not know that it is easy to do --but it does require documentation. If you can change it at Social Security, you can be assured you can vote (if you are a citizen.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics