Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let's just cut through all the bullshit about whether or not he was illegal (he wasn't, and was under an order of protection). [/quote] Not illegal? He is not a citizen. He is not a permanent legal resident. What visa did he have that let him stay in the US? The order of protection did not make him legal.[/quote] A person can have no legal status in the US and still have legal rights to due process of the law. This isn't that difficult of a concept for people to understand. [/quote] The person said he was not illegal. He was and is. And he got due process.[/quote] Oh, did the due process happen before or after the "clerical" error that caused him to be deported?[/quote] Before.[/quote] 9 Supreme court justices disagree but I am sure you know better[/quote] The Supreme Court said treat him as if you hadn't made the mistake. They didn't say he required more due process.[/quote] The supreme court said to facilitate his return and Trump is playing semantics[/quote]The Supreme Court said facilitate his release from custody. They didn't say return to US.[/quote] " The order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador[b] and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador[/b]" [/quote] He would just be deported again. He isn't coming back to Maryland to live.[/quote] The facilitation part needs to happen or there are far larger and long term concerns if it does not. [/quote] The facilitation part implies that his country will first agree to release him. It doesn't sound like his president will release him.[/quote] It doesn't sound like our own country is, thus far, providing any evidence it complied attempting to facilitate, per the Appeals court ruling. [/quote] Wrong. Read the DOJ’s filing.[/quote]The government has facilitated his return as the district judge ordered. However, the Supreme Court ordered that they facilitate his release from custody, which they have not done. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics