Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Never ever in the history of testimony has someone ever given false testimony! The ratings of these hearings are deplorable. The vast majority of the country has moved on. This grandstanding non both sides is wasting time and money. The country has moved on and is worried about inflation, crumbling infrastructure, and high gas prices. They really do not care as much as the small minority of posters here seem to think they do or should. [/quote] Completely false. Millions are watching. Millions want accountability.[/quote] MILLIONS are not watching. The ratings do not reflect.[/quote] They are watching. They are watching streaming which isn’t recorded by the ratings. For every 1 person watching tv I know 20 who watch later via streaming.[/quote] Wrong. Nielsen +7 accounts for streaming. No one I know on the left or right is watching nor do they care one bit! [/quote] You can keep telling yourself that until the cows come home but it simply is not true. I and everyone I know cares deeply and is following the hearings. Polls prove you wrong. We are the suburban mothers who catch up on news when we can. We are also a major voting block. [/quote] Even the note she said she wrote and identified as her own handwriting is NOT true.[/quote] It's not? It's false? Have you read the thread?[/quote] I have. And this is my summation: Trump tried to carjack the beast from way way in the back seat (stretch limo) and to do so, turned into elastic man to grab the driver’s clavicle. The men who have served four different presidents without an infraction are now lying sacks of crap (though clearly good enough to serve Obama) and this young woman is a hero. Did I sum that up right?[/quote] If you are talking about the Secret Service they have a history of being drunk “lying sacks of crap”. The SS personal involve are all trump loyalists and were replaced as soon as trump was forced from office. These same SS agents were not trusted by Pence. Pence refused to get into the car controlled by SS agents. He was tipped out. It is interesting the no one has come out on record from the secret service? Also why are you lying about the vehicle. It was an SUV. There is video of it. Now if you want to throw shade we should question the SS agents who disobeyed a direct order from the president. He wanted to go to the Capitol. The SS has no authority to over rule the president. Too bad for you and your fail insurrection. Would have been a lot more killed if trump had made it to the Capitol. [/quote] These same SS agents served Obama as well. And two other Presidents besides Trump. [/quote] Ornato is a Trump political operative. "Trump installed Tony Ornato -- his former lead US Secret Service agent --- as deputy chief of staff for operations in part bc FLOTUS --- then chief preferred him over Max Miller. But the move unnerved West Wing aides who knew the Secret Service was supposed to be non-political." https://twitter.com/hugolowell/status/1518329760547540995 ---- "[S]enior Secret Service official Anthony Ornato was detailed to White House as a Trump political adviser. He's now back at USSS." https://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn/status/1518321475173994498 [/quote] We don’t know what Ornato’s angle is because he has not made any public statements yet. It’s best not to assume anything. He’s obviously testified. So if she said anything that contradicted his testimony he’d be defending himself from perjury. He’s not. Who knows show these “sources” are? [/quote] All these guys are going to understate what Trump did and said because they all want to stay tight with the Republican patronage network. The truth doesn’t get you sweet high-paying gigs. [/quote] They aren’t going to lie under oath though. [/quote] I mean, there’s a really good chance there are more witnesses that heard this story from people who were there. I’m sure it went around. Maybe Ornato embellished when he retold the story, but he did already confirm that Trump was irate about not going to the Capitol. That’s the important thing. Whether or not he assaulted an agent is honestly a tangent.[/quote] The actual important thing is that Trump knew there were weapons and violent people there that day and he didn’t care. He wanted to get Pence and a few other people killed and to prevent them from certifying the election. That’s the important thing. [/quote] Actually, if you read the documents from the Capitol Police that Solomon brought out today, Pelosi and others in Congress knew that between Christmas and New Years Eve. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics