Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Why is the Foxhall Community Citizens Association scared of public school children?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't think people have thoughts about candidates much beyond the first one or two, and the same problems with strategic voting crop up with how you order candidates as they do if you just choose one candidate.[/quote] In ranked-choice there is no strategic voting. Rank them in your actual order of preference. That's the appeal. [/quote] Not true, the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem is the formal statement of the logic. Here is an example: http://probability.ca/jeff/rankedstrategic.html But it is better than the system we have now[/quote] I'd describe it a little more simply: the same strategic voting issues you have with 1 candidate in a multi-candidate field crop up when you do ranked choice. You want one person to win, but don't think they will, so you vote for someone else. Now you have to figure out your strategy for every ranking! ~6 plausible candidates is simply too many. Ward 2 shows what can happen when you have a large primary field. I have nothing against Pinto, but no way she wins in a smaller field.[/quote] Same with Nadeau's last race, where she received fewer votes than the two people running against her combined. One strong candidate would have easily beaten her.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics