Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous. Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled. http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1[/quote] Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work. [/quote] Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.[/quote] + 1 million Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed![/quote] We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape. https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10 [/quote] Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.[/quote] So we are allowed to doubt a woman who has changed her story more often than she has changed her name, which is a lot, and has defrauded a charity and lied in bankruptcy court? OK.[/quote] Sure, you are allowed to doubt her. I assume you will do the same for the next time an R is accused, because PP says that "we went back to doubting women"....even though the woman in PP's "story" never accused anyone of anything.[/quote] Um, yes she did. With signed statements and a news conference and everything. And why did you put “story” in quotes? “But those "real allegations" appear to be even more problematic. At the news conference, Wohl distributed a document that was digitally signed, purportedly by the absent accuser Carolyne Cass, in which she said she had been sexually assaulted by Mueller in New York in 2010. In the interview this month, Wohl referred to Cass as a "real accuser" and called her allegations credible.“ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/26/robert-mueller-hoax-how-jacob-wohl-created-sexual-harassment-plot/2993799002/ [/quote] So, now you are going to doubt women because of this false accusation? What will you do the next time an R is accused? Will you also doubt that one?[/quote] I’m going to doubt women who accuse men who get in the way of Trump, because now there’s a record of fans of his paying women to falsely accuse them. [/quote] Then you should have said that, in your post.[/quote] Which post? The one that everyone is assuming I posted about someone else years ago before fans of Trump ruined my trust in the MeToo movement?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics