Reply to Spring 2017 soccer club tryouts

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "Spring 2017 soccer club tryouts "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]11:07 - we sort of did what you are considering.  My 2008 daughter loved rec soccer but wanted more.  We were aiming for the middle ground between rec and travel (ADP at ASA) but friends suggested we try out for travel at the first opportunity because it was her best shot at getting a slot.  Easier to get on a roster the first year when everyone is a newbie than the second (or later) year when there are a bunch of returning kids.  She's a late 2008 birthday, so she was in 1st grade with 3.5 seasons under her belt, while the other kids were mostly in 2nd grade with 5.5 seasons under their belt.  That extra year of play (and the extra months of age) were noticeable during tryouts - she was mostly being outplayed by bigger, faster, better kids.

Because of low numbers at tryouts, we ended up accepting a slot on the lowest of 6 teams.  I wasn't sure she was ready, and we considered saying no.  We liked our team, but being on the lowest team can be ego-busting at times.  We got crushed in almost every game our first season because we were going up against teams who were just better.  The teams above us could take players from our team if they needed bodies, which sometimes meant we played with fewer subs.  We lost one kid to a higher team halfway through the first season.  Second season was better - we started tying games against the teams who had previously crushed us.  Through it all, we were very committed - we played every game, attended every practice.

But I noticed that my daughter wasn't getting much playing time lately, even though she did ok when she was on the field.  She had improved a lot over the year, but it just wasn't enough; the other kids were still better.  She ended up getting cut for next year; she was the only one.  I wish that I had never had her try out for travel and we'd stuck with our original plan to do the in-between league.  We spent a ton of money and a ton of time for just one year - feels like a waste now.  I assumed that once she was in the system, she'd be able to stay in the system, but it's not always the case, and I feel bad that I put her through it.  It's definitely hurt her confidence to know that half the girls on her team moved up a level or two, half stayed put and she's the odd girl out.  Would have been better to have done the in-between league, where she might have stood out, vs. being the lowest kid on the lowest team.

So that's the potential downside of doing travel if you're not sure you're ready.[/quote]

PAC is a more family friendly feel at the younger ages - returning kids get offers and she won't be cut, which is sooo nice. I feel like PAC is travel but not the same intensity of Arlington. We like the coaching better so far at PAC vs Arlington, they really want to develop the kids. Its more hand on. The PAC coaches will take the time to show things to my child (and again if necessary) vs the Arlington way is a quick demonstration and off you go. We have kids at both clubs at each is in the best spot for their needs.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics