Reply to How likely for save act to pass senate?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How likely for save act to pass senate? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Supreme Court ruled this week that the USPS can decide not to deliver mail to people without recourse. So if the leadership decide not to deliver mail in ballots because people are black or democrats, it is totally legal.

But sure, let's limit people's ability to vote because they got married and changed their name.[/quote]

1. Pretty sure that if they don't deliver ballots, there are other laws that would apply.
2. Quit claiming that married women will not be able to vote.  That is a bogus accusation and it is getting tiresome.

For some reason, it would appear that you do not want any limits on who can vote--i.e. you do not want people to prove their citizenship.[/quote]

re 1...like what? If people don't receive their mail in ballots, then what?

It isn't a matter of not wanting any limits on who can vote. As it is. there are limits, and it is up to the states to enforce it. Until the 2020 election this was never an issue. It wasn't an issue in 2024 either, apparently, but it is now. Why was it an issue in 2020, but not 2024? What is the proof it is an issue at all, other than "trump says so" ?

[/quote]

I would think there would be civil rights laws affected if the woman's accusation is true.  I think the ruling was just on whether or not she could sue for monetary damages.

Thinking about this, a few years ago, DH sent a check to our cable company.  We had been with them for years, but they claimed they did not receive the check.  This happens.  Does this mean we could sue for damages from the post office?  Was it deliberate?  probably not.

Another time, someone sent us a check that we did not receive--until two years later.  It was very dirty and bent.  It appeared to have been stuck in the mailbox somewhere.  (The person had sent us a replacement check when we did not receive it.)  If we had not received a replacement check, could we have sued?

Again, if this has a racial element in it, I would certainly hope that someone was fired and charged.  But, sue the post office for money?  That could really be a Pandora's box.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics