Reply to Van Hollen in El Salvador

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let's just cut through all the bullshit about whether or not he was illegal (he wasn't, and was under an order of protection).

[/quote]  Not illegal?  He is not a citizen.  He is not a permanent legal resident.  What visa did he have that let him stay in the US?
The order of protection did not make him legal.[/quote]

A person can have no legal status in the US and still have legal rights to due process of the law. This isn't that difficult of a concept for people to understand. [/quote]

The person said he was not illegal.  He was and is.
And he got due process.[/quote]

Oh, did the due process happen before or after the "clerical" error that caused him to be deported?[/quote]

Before.[/quote]

9 Supreme court justices disagree but I am sure you know better[/quote]
The Supreme Court said treat him as if you hadn't made the mistake.  They didn't say he required more due process.[/quote]

The supreme court said to facilitate his return and Trump is playing semantics[/quote]The Supreme Court said facilitate his release from custody.
They didn't say return to US.[/quote]

" The order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador[b] and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador[/b]" [/quote]Which means they can deport him to another country.  Or they can reopen his case and get rid of the block on El Salvador.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics