Reply to Volleyball club- recap and thoughts

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "Volleyball club- recap and thoughts"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]MVSA 12 Vortex beat Paramount 13 Tate team today.  MVSA was playing up.  It shows that you don't have to pay a premium price to be on a good volleyball club.[/quote]

That is Paramount’s 2nd/“B” team. Paramount VBC 14 Cozad (Paramount’s 2nd team in that age group) finished 3rd place in the 14 Open Division at Capitol Hill Classic. Metro 18 north team always solid [/quote]

Oh, so you are saying that this 2nd rated/B Paramount team wasn't good enough to beat a U12 team that has been playing with the lower net of 7' and  the volley lite balls all season until now.[/quote]

Do you not see MAPL’s where Metro and Paramount’s top U14 teams routinely beat 15 and 16 year old teams (check out MAPL Hampton where Paramount 15-1, Metro 14 Travel and Paramount 14-1 finished 1st, 2nd, and 5th, respectively). 2’s teams in this area are not typically very strong, so a 1’s teams in a lower age group should beat a 2nd team in an older age group. Metro 18 North (Jerry, good coach) is always a team that is in contention in the lower divisions of qualifiers, but the other  2’s teams in that club are pretty bad. I believe Paramount started having 2nd teams three years ago. Their 14-2 finished 3rd in Open at Cap Classic, which was a better finish than dozens of the other 1’s teams of other CHRVA clubs. MDJrS 2’s teams are bad. MVSA does good job with 2’s teams [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics