Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)[/quote]

According to the CW, on the stand the other day was the first time he told that whole story. I don’t know if I would say he didn’t give ANY statement though, for example I’m pretty sure on the 911 call and/or bodycam he says stuff like I shot him, he was stabbing my wife. I don’t remember exactly what he said on which one, but he definitely said stuff.

Soon after that he must have lawyered up and given very minimal statements/explanations besides whatever he had already said. He was driving for Uber to make money while Juliana was in jail. I would assume if he did not give any statements (that added up) he would have been on unpaid admin leave pretty quickly. But even if he did still get his salary, imo it would be pretty tight to pay all their bills plus lawyer bills but I guess that’s where Tess comes in. Christine could have had life insurance but what happens with that when there’s such an investigation? I’m not sure.

I think if he had told that story or even half of it on record anywhere before, the CW case would be somewhat different and stronger (so even if he does appeal or has a hung jury here, I think the evidence would be more overwhelming next time because of this statement). [/quote]

During the testimony the CW basically said he listened to the CW's evidence throughout the whole trial and then crafted his story around it for his testimony. [/quote]

I wonder then, why make up something like the work meeting? I don't think it was necessary based on the CW's case, was it? The birthday party in NY I assume was real because he and Juliana discussed it on Discord before the murderers.

He was smart about most of the details, so I wonder why he made up a meeting with his manager, when he knew his managers were both out of town. 
[/quote]

More inside baseball for ya'll.   I assume, but don't know, that TIGTA was very interested the events that caused the discharge of a government firearm that caused death or serious bodily injury(shop language).  As far as the TIGTA investigation, It gets a little nuanced legally as any statement he provided would have been likely subject to a Kalkines warning.  As far as I understand, his statements covered under Kalkines could not be used in any criminal procedure.

I understand he was on admin leave and terminated from his position with the IRS shortly before he was arrested.

The ghost meeting has.me a little perplexed.  there are a hundred reasons that an agent might need to come in early for that would be hard to disprove.  My best guess is that BB told this story previously or there is text messages with CB referencing his meeting and he had to stick with that story.  [/quote]

I think he cooked up the morning meeting lie later. He did say the bizarre “I need to call my manager” as he was leaving his home that day with emergency workers, but I don’t see much foundation for it elsewhere. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics