Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
Reply to "The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75. She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.[/quote] For God's sake, no you do not. If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.[/quote] +1 The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.[/quote] Why would she allow that? [/quote] Because she is lacking in knowledge. Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face. [/quote] Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?[/quote] Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?[/quote] I doubt she was pregnant when the photo was taken. And if she was, he didn’t know. Furthermore, if she was pregnant at the time of the photo, she shouldn’t be getting crap injected into her body. I totally agree with the mouthpiece interpretation. [/quote] She has been visibly pregnant for the last two months, and she already knows the gender of the baby, so not newly pregnant. He surely knew she was pregnant back when he took photo. [/quote] [b]The Vanity Fair photo shoot was in mid November.[/b] Why would she tell a journalist that she was pregnant then? [/quote] You are the second person I have seen say this. What is the source for that? I just don't believe that's true (not accusing you of lying but clearly if you and another person are saying it, the claim is coming from somewhere). They were able to go from photoshoot to entire article spread in a month? I was under the impression that these things took closer to 2-3 months.[/quote] Multiple articles say November 13. Here’s one: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/vanity-fair-portraits-white-house-b2885676.html[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics