Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sure, Baldoni verbally abusing a female director is nothing to see here, but the unsealed recording that Blake herself put on the docket will be ruinous. [/quote]

It won’t be ruinous, it just may be that she took liberties with how it was quoted.  Much like the rest of her case.[/quote]

I wouldn't be surprised if they did that either, but it's a bit OTT to suggest that warrants them hiring people to post about Ayoub, when the much more realistic explanation is people are reacting "organically" to something that was unsealed that people have been very interested to know, which happens to be bad for Baldoni. [/quote]

Yea, the Blake bot duo has a history of being very organic.  Give me a break! [/quote]

If a poster supports posts in any way favorable to Blake, it is a bot (not just any bot, one if exactly two).

If a poster supports Baldoni, they are authentic.

When Liman's decisions benefit Blake, liman is on the take, hot rubbing with Blake's lawyer.

When Liman's decisions benefit Baldoni, these are the only fair decisions. Or Liman issues them as cover for his Blake bias.

If a person other than Blake reports negative experiences with Baldoni or Wayfarer, they are lying and likely paid by Blake.

If a person reports negative experiences with Blake, they should be believed regardless of the recency or reliability of their experience.

And so on. It's very fascinating, watching this ideology develop around Baldoni, a person most people had never heard of before last year.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics