Reply to Volleyball club- recap and thoughts

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "Volleyball club- recap and thoughts"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=FPYCparent]Thanks for the historical perspective offered in this thread.  I've learned quite a bit.

So, what can CHRVA do to raise its profile (and the profile of its member clubs) at a national level?  (I think there may be some agreement that CHRVA's national profile is ... lacking.)

[list]It seems that Metro and Paramount are capable of representing CHRVA well in most cases, but does either club stand to gain anything if CHRVA wants to have a more prominent presence?  Could the two even agree to collaborate to push the region forward?[/list]

[list]I think I understand that teams have to compete in two "local" tournaments to qualify for CHRVA Bid Regionals.  Capital Hill counts as one ... and Metro seems to be tied to the hip of that one.  Do any of the other large-[i]ish[/i] events also count like the one at National Harbor and Charm City?  Do other regions have similar requirements for competing in "local" tournaments?  What if clubs could earn a "local event credit" for competing in an out-of-region event that fields Open level pools of 40 or 50+ teams (e.g., Volley by the James) or one of the M-APLs?  I'm thinking that CHRVA teams at those events are extending the reach of the region and could be deserving of something like a local event credit to CHRVA Bid Regionals.

I wonder if these one-day tourneys hosted by MVSA/MDJRS/Vienna Elite/etc. are really doing a service for the region as a whole (at the Open level, at least).  On the other hand, would these one-days go away if that "local" event requirement is loosened ... and would the host clubs ultimately lose out on a significant income generator?[/list][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics