Reply to Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Comment: Libya was never a "number 1 terrorist state", and if it became a haven for ragtag terror groups, then the blame finger for that points squarely at the US, whose illegal intervention destroyed a stable regime in that country. Another page in the American "seagull management" style - fly in, shit all over, and leave.
Response: Between 1969 and 1987 Libya was the world's leading sponsor of gobal terrorism.  https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/muammar-qaddafi-and-libyas-legacy-of-terrorism/

But, if you believe that Libya was a 'stable regime' under Qaddafi, my guess is that you consider North Korea a 'stable regime' as well?

Since Libya is off the terrorist list, if you're worried Americans left Libya, don't worry - they can just renew their visa now.  https://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=1965753&page=1

Comment: Do you think the Ukrainians in Crimea objected to Russian takeover?
Response: Yes, I think the dead ones did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#:~:text=Casualties%20in%20the%20Russo%2DUkrainian,2022%20Russian%20invasion%20of%20Ukraine.

Comment: Well the US IS trying to put on trial and imprison Julian Assange, isn't it? It's all fun and games and "freedom of press" when it's some other guy's secrets on the front page. But when the same relentless scrutiny turns toward America, then it's all like "national secuuuurity!"
Response: Versus assassination in the name of "national secuuuurity!" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_Russia.  Strange that you don't take up that as an issue?

Comment: I'm not making an argument that Russia is as bad as Al-Saud; the Al-Saud is in fact much worse. I'm simply pointing out, to your predictable squealing, that when Mrs. Sikorski tells a tale of "global implications" of the world split into democracies and autocracies, it's not entirely inappropriate to point out that the world's largest democracy is heavily invested in supporting, arming and squashing dissent for the world's largest block of autocrats.
Response: Your dogma is very narrow.  Anyone quoting Radek Sikorski needs a Life.  Get out more.  Seriously.  I don't even know what you're going on about now.

What you should be more concerned about this this:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/russias-wagner-boss-threatens-ukraine-pullout-citing-starving-forces-of-ammunition

Once Prigozhin outlives his usefulness, who will Putin turn on.. er.. turn to next?  SVD?  FSB?  GRU?  Better pack your bags - you may be headed to the 'Russian Front' at Bakhmut![/quote]

Please tell me what else to think about, I really love that. No one should be trusted to make that choice without your wuss counsel. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics