Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Framing Britney Spears"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just read the New Yorker piece. Her dad should be jailed, and every lawyer and the retired judge should be investigated. The story of her possible postpartum breakdown in 2008-2010 really takes me back to an old job, where I was in my 20s and 30s. The other youngish women were MERCILESS about her, calling her white trash, a bad mother, stupid, a whore, a druggie. I have addiction in my family and didn’t judge in the same way, at all, but it was years before I had a baby, and I never thought of the crippling nature of her life’s pace and hormones colliding to help create a nightmare. The only good thing about reading this story today is my assumption that nasty observations won’t fly anymore, and that she may actually get some freedom with some financial controls if necessary according to a truly neutral assessor. Team Brit Brit.[/quote] Perhaps. Or, maybe her father is trying to prevent another Amy Winehouse or Lindsay Lohan situation. It’s a fact she has mental health and addiction issues. It’s a miracle she still has a viable career and assets. Lohan and Winehouse don’t. The difference? The conservatorship. Both Winehouse and Lohan were very talented. Their issues and lack of protection created their downfall. [/quote] Interesting that you mentioned AW and LL since they too have fathers who are shady AF. [/quote] And yet Britney remains sober, wealthy, employable, and her brand is protected. See the tangible difference? [/quote] And yet her father, with the assistance of the state, is “in her uterus” so to speak. Oh well, as long as she is sober, wealthy, and employable who cares if her reproductive and financial decisions are controlled by men? [/quote] She couldn’t even take care of the two,she had, why should she be allowed to have more?[/quote] We don’t have minimum requirements to have children in this country. Your statement and question could easily be applied to a not insignificant portion of the population. Are you even serious?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics