Reply to Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Sorry, but he's guilty. His intent was to kill. It's obvious, and no earnest acting will make me believe otherwise.

[/quote]

His intent was to kill??? Are you out of your mind? He had his camera on, multiple cops had their cameras on, bystanders were recording him in his face on their phones, he on multiple occasions repositioned GF when he was complaining - in what world do you think his actual intent was to kill the guy. Like I can’t even understand that as a possible consideration.[/quote]

The defense attorney showed today that the prosecution misrepresented a few things.  The blood from Floyd’s nose was from his fighting to stay out of the car.  Floyd was on his side, not in the prone position when he reached the tire to reposition himself.  They called EMS one minute into the scuffle when Floyd was bleeding.  So much reasonable doubt.  Not to mention, Floyd’s horrible health and his toxicology confirming the evidence of Fentanyl and meth in his system.  I think the defense was phenomenal today, and I could not convict.  [/quote]

Maybe he would have died later on that day, after ingesting the drugs.  But he didn't OD.  He died before that ever could have happened. [/quote]

It the 1L crim law discussion- if you shoot someone jumping from the Empire State Building on the way down, it’s still murder[/quote]

Great analogy. +1[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics