Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Senator Leahy asks if Barrett agrees that nobody is above the law. Barrett: "I agree that no one is above the law." When Leahy follows up on whether presidents can self-pardon, Barrett punts & says she will not offer a view. Leahy: "I find your answers somewhat incompatible."[/quote] Leahy is being disingenuous here. It is clear that the presidential pardon power says The President "shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." It is also been opined by the Supreme Court that they can be pre-emptive (i.e., before actually being charged), but it has not been considered whether the President can pardon himself. Regardless, because it is a pardon only for offences against the U.S., it looks like an admission of guilt, therefore a pre-emptive pardon that attempted to say it was only because of a prospective malicious prosecution would cause an additional aspect to the controversy. Also, whether "except in Cases of Impeachment" would be read broadly to mean anything that could give rise to an Impeachment (i.e. high crimes and misdemeanors of a President even where Impeachment is not a potential punishment because the person is no longer in office) or only to an actual Impeachment process. I find the Constitutional issue here interesting. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics