Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Prosecution closing is done. Here comes the bumbling defense.[/quote] How did she do? Did she make most of the points we have discussed here and were in yesterday's texts about how implausible his whole story is?[/quote] I think good overall, I’m watching live and haven’t really analyzed but she overall focused a lot on how implausible it would be for Christine to set this up based on timing and the account activity, and ended with a good overview of the forensics that showed staging. She emphasized the defense never attempted to contradict any of that. To answer another question, I don’t think she did bring up the work meeting. She did bring up that there’s no evidence Christine ever engaged in online dating or BDSM activity other than the defendant’s “self serving statements.” Defense said he’s not gonna go through evidence but was just reading off a bunch of papers which were the digital PI’s slides that showed nothing except that sometimes Juliana used the account when Brendan was not home. It’s basically exactly what you would expect from the rest of the defense case, the points are there with respect to his job, but it’s very incoherent and rambling. He does have a portable mic today so that’s good. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics