Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]See 16 new photos:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/12/politics/epstein-photos-trump-clinton-bannon[/quote]
🤮
gross. how many of those girls in that pic with trump are underaged[/quote]

None were, the faces were blocked by the Dems so that people would assume they were children. The unredacted photo is online, they were all adults. [/quote]

Wow, you really are in denial.[/quote]

NP. What, exactly, did the PP say that is untrue that would mean s/he's in denial? [/quote]

Follow along.  Those pictures have been in the public for years.  Those were not underaged girls and it made no sense that their faces were covered unless they were trying to imply the girls were underage.

If you read the posts here, it obviously worked with some of you.[/quote]
The names and faces of all the victims are redacted. Some of the trafficking victims were underaged and some were not.[/quote]

Then, why did the Dems redact the faces of adult women who were not victims and had nothing to do with Epstein?  Was it not to mislead people into thinking these women were victims and underage?
FWIW, this was a public picture of Hawaiian Tropic Models at Mar-a-Lago.
There was a reporter on MsNow who assumed they were underage because the Dems redacted their faces.  [/quote]

Many of those Hawaiian Tropic "adult women" were just 18 years old.  Why is a grown man surrounding himself with teenage girls?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics