Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That was a flash of “oh f%#$” on BBs face when CW elicited that her expert heard a voice saying something before the groaning![/quote]

Right! "And what did the human voice say?" rudely interrupted by another of Carroll's "may we approach" requests. Grr! Don't leave us hanging![/quote]
I would think that the jury will share our desire to know just what that was and be none to pleased about the defense obscuring it. Are they supposed to consider it? No. But that bell is not unringing. They know there is something on that tape that the [b]defense desperately wants to conceal[/b].[/quote]

Then why wouldn't the prosecution enter it into evidence? The last part?[/quote]

I thought prosecutor entered the paper analysis into evidence. He was only given a paper report which prosecution entered into evidence. Detective didn’t need the entire report to simplify it for jurors.

Rebuttal witness Detective Augustine- Fairfax County technical, forensic, audio analyst.
Expert in video and audio analysis. Poked holes in specter frequency guy analysis. He conducted a wave form analysis and listening critical analysis to separate that portion of audio.

Remember the word “stitched.” Jurors breathed a sigh of relief.

Augustine’s deeper analysis explains how the defense expert [i]stitched[/i] two files together- exemplar was stitched to 911 call.

In the exemplar, there’s a 6 second sample. But there are two different audio files, both 200hz that look similar. To me, being a non-expert, it’s easy to take two snippets based on same sound pitch or whatever lol. I mean, weren’t we all DJs back in the vinyl days with new mixing technology.

First 6 seconds is dog moaning. Nothing lines up until that specific time. Juncture point is stitched. When listening there was no desensitizing of the two files, no point of ending of first or beginning of last file, it’s faded or mixture of both files deliberately 6 seconds of dog groan, mix into 911 audio and human groan believed to be Joe.

Augustine putt 911 call into audio software looked at wave form and critical listening. Observed and heard the 911 call computerized voice operator ask where is your emergency? He simply increased the volume of one portion of the 911 call and detected a human voice (Joe).

Any one of us following this case with sharp hearing can absolutely hear a human voice groaning. The second analyst may have a speech challenge but he heard what we all heard. Clearly defense has two guys on team Brenda.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics