Reply to Barr and Durham

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr and Durham"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Checking in here…finding out that DCUM is still full of peeps who took Russiagate at face value.

Things are just going to look worse and worse.[/quote]
In 2024 Durham will come up with something.  Right?[/quote]

didn't he just come up with something?[/quote]

Not really, no.  [/quote]

It’s a grand jury indictment.  Guessing it means something to the defendant. [/quote]

Well, it sure does.  He got fired for it.

For this nonsense.  Any sensible person would be pretty disgusted with Durham for this.[/quote]

Why?  Nonpartisan answers only, please.[/quote]

Because there’s no admissible evidence that the allegedly false statement was made.  There were two parties to the conversation.  Neither took notes.  There is no recording or transcript.  The other party, the FBI GC, has testified under oath that he doesn’t clearly remember the conversation and doesn’t recall Sussman saying he wasn’t there on behalf of a client.  The only evidence that the statement was made are notes taken by a person the FBI GC talked to, and they are pretty vague.  Those notes will get bounced as inadmissible hearsay in pre-trial motions, and the case will then collapse.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics