Reply to How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"I'm not here to destroy the ACA" - ACB

She is humble and fair even while Coons tries otherwise.[/quote]

+1
She has stated over and over that the role of a justice is not to make policy.  It is simply to apply the law, as already written.  She is right.  [/quote]

That's not what the Supreme Court is for.  Does she know that?  [/quote]

We know that liberals don't believe this is what the court is for.  PP is correct.  You believe the court is there to write law.  [/quote]

According to Republicans, the SCOTUS is supposed to be full of activist judges to overturn laws they do not like.  They do their typical projection by saying it is the liberals who want activist judges, but, as is usual with them, they accuse the other party of what they are the ones doing.

They want judges to push their activist, conservative agendas to overturn laws, even when doing so is not in keeping with what the majority of the American people actually want.

They want judges to do things like say corporations are the same as individuals.

The GOP are simply FOS.

[/quote]

Don't gaslight us. The reason it SEEMS like originalists are activists is because they have to be ACTIVE to fix all of the activism that subverted democratic majorities in the 1960s and 1070s with the liberal Warren and Burger courts. If the libs hadn't messed with it to start with and just passed amendments rather than "discovered rights" to change the Constitution by fiat, we wouldn't be here. There wouldn't even be a federalist society. [/quote]

+1
Liberals simply want to legislate from the bench.  If this was a liberal nominee, they’d be fawning over her.  [/quote]

Why don't you tell everyone how de-segregation is legislating from the bench?[/quote]

Since you appear to be obsessed with segregation and fear-mongering that it could ever return to the US, here’s what ACB had to say about Brown v Board of Education:

Brown, Barrett said under questioning from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is among a handful of cases considered "super precedents" in the legal community because "[b]it is unthinkable it would be overturned."[/b]

Barrett said Brown "is precedent." In a previously written article, she said that "it is super precedent" and that because "[b]people consider it to be on that very small list of things that are so agreed upon by everyone, calls for its overruling do not exist."[/b]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/barrett-reveals-formula-reversing-landmark-rulings-n1243248[/quote]

That is just her opinion.  The fact is, it is not agreed upon by everyone.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics