Reply to Whistleblower complaint released

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Whistleblower complaint released"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I messed up the placement of my response to the above post:

It's the exact opposite: the whistleblower requirement was changed to ALLOW hearsay.

Read the article.

Smh. This is completely outrageous and the crafters are having a good laugh. Laugh now, savor it now.

I could be wrong.
[/quote]

This indicates that this is a political hit job.  The timing is everything.  [/quote]

The complaint isn’t hearsay and it is true. It is being investigated and validated properly but Trump and Giuliani and the White House have admitted all the major allegations. So the Whistleblower rules change had no effect on this. [/quote]

It is hearsay.  Changing the rules after complaint was filed--which is the way it appears-- is not the way things are usually done.  This was orchestrated and staged by way more than one guy/girl and a lawyer.[/quote]

No, it isn't hearsay. And the rules never required first hand knowledge. This is Fake News from the Federalist.
[url]https://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-shows-russian-trolls-how-its-done-with-trump-inspector-general-whistleblower-smear[/url]

From the article:

[quote]“There’s never been a requirement that a whistleblower have firsthand knowledge of what they’re reporting,” said Irvin McCullough, an investigator at the nonprofit Government Accountability Project (and the son of a former IC IG). “They need to have a reasonable belief. The firsthand information is usually gathered by the inspector general, as I believe did occur here.”[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics