Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2029 Girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I expect the Capital program will continue to attract a certain type of family and player who values good culture and a business-like approach from the club. Capital will attempt to weed out the culture killers, even if it sacrifices lacrosse talent, which will ultimately be better for everyone involved. The mission is not to win games; the mission is to get girls recruited and that requires players and families who are recruitable. Although winning is not everything, it is part of the equation. Based on PP, the recruiting coaches are not consistently at the lower level of competition. Which is why people on this forum have directed patented to the successful Capital. [/quote] If Capital wanted to win they would put in their best 12 and rest them only when necessary. Instead, they will play each player as close to 50% of the time as possible so everyone has an chance to be seen. Obviously they are going to lose more games following this approach, but they will have enough recruitable players, and enough juice as a organization, to end up in the brackets where they can be seen by coaches, even if they don't win those brackets. I can assure you that coaches do not care at all which team wins some random summer tournament game.[/quote] Such cope. Almost all teams play 50/50 in HS, it would be program suicide otherwise. They don’t beat HG, M&D black, YJ, etc because they aren’t as good as them. The 2026 team had a losing record last year, the 2027s stunk it up at 3-10-1, and the 2028s stunk it up at 3-9-1. The 2025 and 2026 teams did pretty well recruiting wise, but I don’t think the 2027 and 2028s will and so now the cracks begin to form. It might not scuttle the 2029 Cap Blue team, but once a viable competitor shows up Cap Blue is cooked.[/quote] Capital has placed literally hundreds of girls in D1 and the recruiting director is trusted by everyone who matters. Sure, a team may be able to compete on the field, but establishing recruiting bona fides is something that will take a viable competitor years to build. There is a big difference between having a college coach take your call, and having them trust your judgement about a particular player. That kind of relationship only comes with a long track record of not bullsh*tt*ng them.[/quote] Lol, no D1 coach in America just listens to what a coach or director of a club says, they watch film and live action of every single player they recruit. And the reason Cap Blue did well was the same as every other big program, they had great players. There is no magical relationship with a director that is going to get a marginal kid on a D1 team, again, more cope. Unless the 27s and 28s bring in more players, that team won’t have the same recruiting results as 26 and 25, and the 29s better pray that every single good m&d dc player decides to come over, or they will just be a barely top 30 team with avg recruiting results.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics