Reply to Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jill Biden's response to Hur in a fund raising email.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/11/jill-biden-special-counsel-report[/quote]

I'm losing respect for Jill with every day that goes by.  She needs to insist Biden step down, but she won't.  It's really disgraceful.[/quote]

She should insist her husband be prosecuted, his memory is fine. [/quote]
There isn’t evidence to support a prosecution. As has been stated in the report. [/quote]

There’s plenty of evidence. Willful removal and possession of classified documents going back decades. This is not subject to argument - it is a fact.

The ONLY reason he is not being prosecuted is because he’s mentally unfit to stand trial. [/quote]

Not at all fact.  You are just making shit up.  That is NOT AT ALL what the report said.  The investigation is done, no evidence of willful misconduct, the report says Biden's testimony was clear and compelling, and THAT is not subject to argument.  CASE IS CLOSED.  Your personal opinions to the contrary are invalid and irrelevant.[/quote]

What a load of crap.

The very first paragraph of the report said that he found Biden WILLFULLY  took and retained classified material.  
And, he did not say his testimony was "clear and compelling."  He said what was clear was that Biden had memory issues.

Yes... the case was closed.

So, we have a president who on one hand isn't mentally strong enough to be charged, yet mentally strong enough to be the leader of the free world.

Make it make sense.  [/quote]

So, you only read the first paragraph and not the rest of the document where he was pretty specific in saying no crimes were committed and no charges were warranted.[/quote]

PP hasn't even read the first paragraph!  He's lying about even that!  The first paragraph says "We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter.1 We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy did not foreclose criminal charges against a sitting president."[/quote]

No criminal charges warranted because he has such a bad memory.....

"We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Eiden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him-by then a former president well into his eighties-of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness."[/quote]
If Hur said that in court the other side would object as it’s entirely speculative.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics