Reply to 10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well, I didn’t think that the forced birthers supported child rape prior to this. How wrong I was. My God. [/quote]
Correct. Go look at the GOP corruption thread for more. I lost track over the hundred plus pages of how many rapists and child rapists and other assorted life destroying sex crimes various Republican elected officials are guilty of. It’s disgusting and it’s clearly a serious problem in the party.[/quote]

Yeah, I’m a political moderate who has voted for Republicans in the past, and I used to think that the Democrats were being pretty hypocritical about the sex assaults by Republicans because there are plenty of sex assaulter amongst the Democrats too. But the aftermath of the Roe decision has shown to me that this issue of Republican child rapists is deeply part of the party. They really, as a group, support child rape. It’s horrifying to watch.

I’m probably not going to vote Republican again in my lifetime, barring serious restructuring of the party. I can’t stomach it. Between the enthusiastic cheerleading for child rape (my God!!), the insurrection, and the blind allegiance to the gun lobby, I can’t see how I could ever vote for them. [/quote]

WTF are you talking about?  “Cheerleading for child rape”??  Do you even hear yourself?[/quote]

What is inaccurate about that assessment and the current Republicans? They are in favor of child rape. [/quote]

The more you repeat this garbage, the farther people will run from you.  Please stop.  No one - NO ONE - is in favor of child rape, or rape of any kind.  You just sound like an utter psychopath.
DP[/quote]

No, it sounds accurate. This is what the Republicans support now. It’s upsetting you because it’s true.

[/quote]

JFC.  Seek help.  There’s no point trying to converse with disturbed people like you.[/quote]

I would think the people in favor of children being raped and forced to bear the child of their rapists are the ones who need to seek help. But if you don’t see anything wrong with that, I can’t help you. [/quote]
+1

ٌYou venal pieces of crap. You seem to grasp on some level that forcing a child to continue a pregnancy is bad, to the extent that one of your mouthpieces speaking before congress literally said that an abortion for a ten year old isn’t abortion (as you have tried to say with ectopic and other life threatening pregnancies, even though the law is written such that doctors can’t give lifesaving abortions in these states).

Come off it. Your whole policy position is stupid and cruel. You know that everyone who isn’t a kool aid swilling forced birther sees that now and you are effing terrified. It’s just a matter of time before some poor 9 or 13 year old dies from pregnancy complications or some photogenic Instagram woman with three kids and 500,000 followers is murdered by your idiotic laws. You know it’s game over. [/quote]

Isn’t the witness saying that the law would not prevent the 10 year old from seeking an abortion because she could be harmed?  [/quote]
Yes, that’s what she claimed. She also claimed that the 10 year old’s abortion wouldn’t be an abortion because she’s 10 and that’s different. But that’s not the way the law was written or interpreted by the hospital lawyers, hence her having to go out of state.

It’s like the forced birthers are so close to admitting the damage that forced birth does to all women and the children resulting from it, but they just want to punish women [i]so damn badly[/i] they’ll twist themselves into these pretzels.  [/quote]

She’s trying to explain why the law would not apply to the child, i.e. it would not meet the terms of abortion defined by their law due to her age and due to rape. The hospital was in error here, and I would dare say negligent. Another in-state hospital could  have made a different decision. [/quote]

She wasn't trying to "explain" anything. She just made an assertion that was untrue because the truth is unpleasant. [/quote]

You heard what you wanted to hear. She was very specific in saying the law would not apply to this child[/quote]
But that is a lie. There is NO age limit in the law.[/quote]

If you look at the law itself in detail (I did), she was certainly eligible for an abortion under Ohio law[/quote]

No she wasn’t. Here’s a breakdown of the two exceptions.  Will prevent maternal death or impairment of a major body system. Mental health cannot be considered. The link to the law is in this clear synopsis. FFS— if you care, read the law. [/quote]

Sorry!  Link here
https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/politics/ohio-politics/ohio-ag-files-motion-to-dissolve-injunction-on-six-week-abortion-ban-bill[/quote]

If mental health cannot be considered, then.. What happens when pregnant woman commits suicide? I don't think she'd care about the legal consequences, the end result is the death of the fetus inside of her anyway.  These morons cannot do basic logic, how do they pass the LSAT?[/quote]

This moron got a 172 on the LSAT, and is telling you to take it up with he Ohio legislature. The statute specifically says mental health cannot be a consideration in providing the abortion.  It’s in the affirmative defenses section of the full, 27 page text of the bill.

You really don’t seem to understand what lawyers do. We give advice based on what the law is, not what we wish it were. If it says no consideration of mental health, then giving a woman an abortion to prevent a suicide is a felony. Is it cruel?  Absolutely.  That seems to the the point for the GOP. [/quote]

I thought the testimony given was that abortion would have been ok because the child would have met the physical damage clause of the statute?[/quote]

That testimony was a lie. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics