Reply to Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Never ever in the history of testimony has someone ever given false testimony!

The ratings of these hearings are deplorable. The vast majority of the country has moved on. This grandstanding non both sides is wasting time and money. The country has moved on and is worried about inflation, crumbling infrastructure, and high gas prices.  They really do not care as much as the small minority of posters here seem to think they do or should. [/quote]

Completely false.  Millions are watching.  Millions want accountability.[/quote]

MILLIONS are not watching. The ratings do not reflect.[/quote]

They are watching. They are watching streaming which isn’t recorded by the ratings.

For every 1 person watching tv I know 20 who watch later via streaming.[/quote]

Wrong. Nielsen +7 accounts for streaming.

No one I know on the left or right is watching nor do they care one bit! [/quote]

You can keep telling yourself that until the cows come home but it simply is not true.  I and everyone I know cares deeply and is following the hearings.  Polls prove you wrong.

We are the suburban mothers who catch up on news when we can.  We are also a major voting block.  [/quote]

Even the note she said she wrote and identified as her own handwriting is NOT true.[/quote]

It's not? It's false? Have you read the thread?[/quote]

I have. And this is my summation:

Trump tried to carjack the beast from way way in the back seat [b](stretch limo)[/b] and to do so, turned into elastic man to grab the driver’s clavicle. The men who have served four different presidents without an infraction are now lying sacks of crap (though clearly good enough to serve Obama) and this young woman is a hero. Did I sum that up right?[/quote]

You might try actually watching/listening to the hearings before you make stuff up. Trump was in a Suburban, not a limo.[/quote]

The beast is a stretch limo. Not ‘whatever car he’s in’. We know he was in a Suburban. We pointed it out. Then the twisting of the media started[/quote]

Ornato called it the Beast. She just repeated what he told her. [/quote]

It's bizarre to focus on this. WH staff since the Obama days has referred to both colloquially as The Beast. [/quote]

McEnany also called it the beast in the tape they ran during Hutchinson's testimony.  It seems "the beast" is just used by WH staff to refer to the armored cars that the president rides in, not to any specific car. [/quote]

Correct, there is a fleet of Presidential vehicles that get called that.  Just like there is a fleet of Presidential helicopters that get called "Marine One" - it's not just one.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics