Reply to TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It is not the applicant's job to determine what the intention of the question is and to answer accordingly, but rather to honestly answer the question that was actually asked.

The question was *not* "Is your family low-income?", no matter how much you argue that this is secretly the intended question.

If the admissions committee used a question about eligibility for free meals as a proxy for low-income, then they screwed up.  They should have asked the question to which they wanted the answer, not a different question. They especially shouldn't have asked a question which was confounded by pandemic policies.[/quote]

And remember this is FCPS - who likely had a communications firm on retainer to help design surveys.  Every communication is put out in zillion languages from an inclusivity perspective so it is inexcusable that would screw up on something so material.  Where was the communications team? Where were the consultants?  Begs the question if this was all too deliberate to pretty up the press release.   [/quote]

It was definitely deliberate. [/quote]

Input - concerned parents are “insane”

Output - Youngkin

Keep going…..

Maybe it was a decision lead by the LEGAL team. Since, you know, a bunch of insane parents decided to sue FCPS. 
[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics