Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Why don't you believe in God?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I've always thought religion was a labeling and reflection of the right vs wrong in all of us. [/quote] So is the field of rationalist ethics. What's the reason for privileging "religion" over reason, given that we've alread established that religion gives no special insight into what is right or wrong?[/quote] Please share this idea of "rationalist ethics" with everyone.[/quote] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_ethics Or check your local library.[/quote]. Strange, isn't it, that human reason would lead to theories of ethics that contain such diametrically opposed maxims? From moral nihilism to pure selfishness to compassion? No one absolute standard emerges victorious. [/quote] In case you didn't notice, the same is true of theology. The Aztecs weren't sacrificing babies to appease reason.[/quote] Yes, they were. They thought they had a very good reason to sacrifice babies. And you are confusing natural law with religion.[/quote] I think you're doing the confusing. Someone claimed that rationalism leads to differing models of morality. PP responded that so does theism. He gave the example of the Aztecs, who were sacrificing babies to appease their gods. Your responded, to paraphrase "No, the Aztecs *were* sacrificing babies to appease reason. They thought they had a good "reason" to try to appease the gods. But of course, sacrificing babies has nothing to do with the formal sense of the word "reason". It's pretty much the purest expression of theology. Finally, you finish with the non-sequiter, "You are confusing natural law with religion." Please, if you're going to contribute, try to include the structure of an argument. Otherwise, it's just confusing for everyone who wants to extend to you a good-will effort to converse.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics