Reply to Official 1st Presidential Debate Thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Official 1st Presidential Debate Thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hold started out fine, then when it was clear Hillary was out of her league, decided to rescue her. That was pretty ridiculous[/quote]

Didn't see that at all - she won most of the exchanges and started out the stronger of the two.[/quote]

Not even close. He was killing her with facts.[/quote]
Oh dear, please go to NPR's fact checking site.  I think you'll eat those words with some relish on top.[/quote]

NPR? AHHAHAHAHAH. How about CNN? Or perhaps Daily Kos?[/quote]

Honey, they have actual citations.  You know? Those things that show what the candidates actually said in the past? Numbers that can be consulted to prove statements right/wrong?  I know that you R's love to claim "liberal bias" and all but facts are what they are. If Trump said something untrue -which is likely- and it shows in those facts, then putting your fingers in your ears and singing "la, la, la" isn't going to help. [/quote]
I've asked this a few times, and no one has responded.  If news sites like NPR, reuters are biased, then what news sources do Trump supporters use to check facts?

I'm actually a moderate republican, but I read NPR and reuters; I go to google news which is a compilation of news sources.  So, what news sources do Trump supporters consider "unbiased"?[/quote]

We don't check one source. I look at multiple sources. If I were to believe this fact checker or that fact checker, I'm letting someone else do the work I can do myself.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics