Reply to Harris Walz interview w CNN

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Harris Walz interview w CNN"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I watched the whole thing. Harris reads as qualified for a city, perhaps state, position.

Her replies didn’t have the depth or nuance I expected from someone who has been part of Biden administration for 3.5 years.

When she talks about spending HOURS in the situation room, I suspect she was being honest—more than one. Less than five.[/quote]

Okay, she's a mediocre candidate.

But she's still much better than the alternative.  Trump is a nearly an octogenarian (and will be part-way through the next presidential term) and is rapidly declining both mentally and physically.  This job is one of the most stressful and aging jobs and he will not be able to survive competently for a four year term.  Biden was much more stable both physically and mentally in 2020 than Trump is now and look where Biden is.  The same will happen to Trump.  It is quite likely that should Trump be elected, Vance would have to execute 25A to have Trump removed from office for age-related incompetency and then we would be left with Vance who is even less qualified than Harris to assume the office.  At this point, Trump is not fit for office and he will only get worse, not better.

Trump did not pay attention to his daily briefings when he was last President.  He will have even less attention span for them now and we would be risking a aging senior who needs to have elder care making uninformed decisions for national and international events and having access to the football.  Additionally, an aging senior who has alienated our European and NATO allies, has courted relationships and proudly touted relationships with Russia's Putin and North Korea's Kim.  You are risking world-wide political instability entrusting the US international relations to someone in his state of age-related decline.

[/quote]I hate to have to 100% agree with you.  I'm so angry that these are our 2 choices for president.[/quote]

I'm a never Trumper and will vote for Harris because of the two she's the better (I am in Maryland so even if I was MAGA it wouldn't matter at the voting box).   But I wish we had 2 better choices.  Walz seems like much better VP than Vance though.  MUCH better. [/quote]

Part of the reason you always think we have crummy choices is that there is a huge industry devoted to tearing down politicians. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics