Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What happened to this California family?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Also a timeline from the sheriff: Saturday, Aug. 14: Jonathan Gerrish researches Hites Cove hike via a phone app. Sunday, Aug. 15: 7:45 a.m., witness sees the Gerrish/Chung family traveling toward the trailhead in their vehicle. Monday, Aug. 16: 11 p.m., a family friend reports the family missing. Tuesday, Aug. 17: 1:53 a.m., the family’s car is located down Hites Cove Road north of Jerseydale. Tuesday, Aug. 17: 1:55 a.m., a search and rescue mission is initiated. Tuesday, Aug. 17: 11 a.m., the family is found dead on the Savage-Lundy Trail by a search and rescue team. Thursday, Aug. 19: Autopsies are completed on the family and dog, “all currently pending toxicology.” Friday, Aug. 20: Search warrants issued for a phone found with the family. Friday, Aug. 20: Search warrants issued for the family’s home and cars. “Nothing significant” is found. Monday, Aug. 23: Additional water samples are collected from water sources “along the trail area.” Tuesday, Aug. 24: A cell phone is delivered to the FBI for data extraction, “awaiting results.” Wednesday, Aug. 25: Search warrants issued for “possible social media access.”[/quote] So likely simultaneous natural causes. What are the odds for that. [/quote] What is wrong with you? It was obviously murder/suicide. I feel so bad for the mom. She tried to get away…it must’ve been awful for her. [/quote] I feel like people leaping to this silly and again, the dog is a complicating factor, but whatever. But pp, despite you feeling for mom, if this was family annihilating by poison it is actually much more likely mom was the perpetrator statistically[/quote] I’m basing my opinion on the disclosed evidence, which clearly points to the dad being the killer. The dog would be killed because he was part of the family. I don’t understand why you don’t get that. [/quote] Are you thinking that he poisoned the water on the trail? That's an unusual theory. [/quote] No. I think he had cyanide (or another fast-acting poison) in the canteen before they left for the hike. When it was time, he gave it to (or forced it on) the mom first. She runs off in agony and dies. He then feeds it to the dog, the baby, and himself…placing everyone seated next to each other. It’s pretty twisted, really. [/quote] There is literally zero solid evidence pointing to dad. You sound like someone who watches a lot of crime drama. I’m not saying it’s impossible that this wasn’t family annihilating or that it wasn’t dad, but there is absolutely no grounds for you to be saying this with such conviction with the evidence given. A grown man forcing cyanide down healthy mom’s throat with a baby on his back? Please. Also they found nothing of interest in the house or car. If he used cyanide there would be physical signs and there would have been electronic evidence as he would have ordered it off the Internet. Can’t buy that at the grocery store. And he wouldn’t care about covering it up. And again, statistically when family annihilation occurs by poison and with very young children, mom is the culprit[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics