Reply to ECNL moving to school year part 2

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Relying on showcases to get your kid recruited for a college soccer program is a hail mary

Serious and credible recruiting happens through individual direct player to coach contact [/quote]
So now showcases arent good for college recruiting? Aug birthdays playing on their grade in school team have no issues.

Stop the nonsense.[/quote] August births will be fine, they are the oldest. It will be toughest for the youngest months, May, June and July. Focusing on August births is a red herring, as they will be doing after to play as the oldest and the will be a position to excel, grade is irrelevant.[/quote]
You have no clue how college recruiting at clubs and leagues works. Aug birthdays playing down are at a serious disadvantage.[/quote]False. They are the oldest, so RAE increases their odds of going further. And college coaches said to clubs and on Facebook that they don't care ages of recruits. Heck your chart had August as the highest month to play male pro and Dec as the lowest.

Only a fool would believe you and want their kid to unnecessarily play up, get discarded and quit the sport.[/quote]

RAE is about early physical bloomers getting selected to teams over smaller late bloomers, before puberty

Pull any roster of all the USYNTs in every age group and Q1 and Q2 are the most represented. You can't argue against the evidence.

Nowhere is there any scientific study that shows Q3 with highest youth representation.

Some guy in his basement created some chart showing August with the most representation is being beyond creative and artistic [/quote]The UK has high Q3 in top players and so did the US national youth teams under SY and was ironically a main reason to go to BY. Your belligerence is too obvious.

When they say "Relative Age Effect (RAE) is a phenomenon where individuals born just after a strict age-cutoff date (e.g., Jan 1 for sports, Sept 1 for school) hold long-term, systemic advantages over younger peers in the same cohort." To think that every RAE effect has to be around Jan 1 is too stupid.[/quote]

Did you call Q1 in England Q3? 😂😂😂🤣🤣

England uses August 31st as age cutoff so January isn't Q1 for them 
sheesh[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics