Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Ahh yes, that seems reasonable. Rush home because his Au pair saw a stranger enter the house and he can’t get a hold of his wife, but once he gets home, hang out in the basement for 10 minutes playing fetch with his dog before he checks on his wife. Makes perfect sense. [/quote]

I agree in the sense it just didn’t happen. Obviously the version Juliana told is true (or at least basically so) and that is Joe on there and he has already been shot. But in trying to create doubt, IF someone believed Juliana was in the basement for longer, then it would create doubt about a lot of elements.

How Carroll planned to run this “Lilly3” clip through the gauntlet of super obvious objections from the prosecution, I have no idea. Unless it’s an audio clip of the dog from previously established bodycam, which was not mentioned at all when the objection came up. It sounds like it was just a random clip which wasn’t authenticated or entered into evidence in any way prior to the expert witness coming on. Nor did there seem to be a plan to do so in that portion of the defense presentation.  
[/quote]

My bad, I thought their theory was going to be that both Juliana and BB stayed in the basement for 10 minutes. It is somewhat more plausible if it was just Juliana but (1) her testimony contradicts it and (2) her version of events makes so more sense.

I wonder when investigators asked them about the noise in the background of the call and if they said it was the husky from day 1, or if this is a “defense” they came up with later.

Sounds like the clip is unauthenticated. I wonder if they can pull the metadata and see when it was created. So crazy to think about this psycho training his husky in the last few months to sound like a dying guy. [/quote]

the news played the full 911 call and so that Joe's mom heard the call and publicly said it was her son and it was devastating. In the pretrial there was one of Joe's friends that also identified it as his voice. It was as clear as day for both of them. Which means the dog and voice expert should find another home and job! It also means Julianna's testimony is totally accurate about the actual murder scene. [/quote]

So the prosecution needs to call these people in rebuttal if the dog theory is in. Don't leave loose threads. Tie it together in the closing argument that BB is grasping at straws.[/quote]

The defense introduces Lily3 and the 911 call at their own peril.  The prosecution introduced CB's clotting disorder through her father.  This served to show her clotting disorder and humanize CB.  Now the defense is going to introduce BS evidence that Lily3 is the obvious moaning of Joe.  what's the prosecution to do.. humanize Joe and have his mother (who he spoke to every day IIRC) testify that she recognizes the voice on the call.  how does she know its Joe... bc he's the kind of guy that calls his mom every day...[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics