Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I did not know what the foundational issue was with the audio expert until the above post. Wow. Just wow. It makes me so sad and scare thinking about this attorney representing someone who is actually innocent. [/quote] To be fair this case has a lot against him but I mean he has some stuff, keep it to Juliana was suicidal, Juliana was getting quotes from prosecutors for her “story,” Juliana changed her mind about staying with Brendan and wanted to go back to Brazil. Lt Miller’s report (this needed to be very brief and directed). Same with the Giaccio and Fayez texts if he wanted to do that but overall that one was risky because it’s really just highlighting everyone thought his client was weird and suspicious from the jump. I’m not sure he needed that portion at all but if so should have been very careful about questioning and established the context of every exhibit clearly. The strategy to create doubt in various areas of the CW case is basically the only avenue for the defense. It’s just been super disorganized and he’s often asking obviously “hostile”witnesses shockingly open ended questions which is bringing in information which only hurts his client. But honestly he is objecting where he needs to and putting in standard motions. I wonder why he doesn’t have more assistance with him especially some more tech savvy assistance. It seems like they hired Lidsky to do quite a bit of work, but he needs (imo) someone who is not a witness since there are obvious parameters on what they can talk about. This is a complex case and to touch on a previous question about public defenders, in this case I believe it’s likely the judge would have appointed more than one person for the defense based on high complexity. There is a lot of digital forensics discovery due to the catfish theory.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics