Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "VHSL 2026 Girls Lacrosse"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So based on where we are in the season. How are we ranking them now? What are the good matchups going forward? [/quote] My top tier local teams are BF, Mad, Robo with a gap to the second tier of YT, Oak, WF. Another gap to third tier of Woodson, McLean, and WS. Cosby appears to be more aligned with the top group. I think our state champ will likely come from Tier 1 plus Cosby. Difficult to judge Woodson (only two games) until they play a team in my top three tiers. Honorable mention to AC. [/quote] Where do you put West Po?[/quote] Right now based off of team games, Tier 4. That score against Washington and Liberty and seeing common opponents tell me they arent serious contenders. But again small sample size. them losing their goalie and top scorer from last year has obviously hurt them[/quote] This. And Tier 4 may be generous. Even last year’s team was not a state contender. 19-2 loss in start quarters is not a real contender. [/quote] It was actually a 22-2 loss in state quarterfinals, but point still made. 2025 WP was a state qualifier (out of a weak Region), but not a state contender. This year's WP team is significantly weaker version of the 25 team. Tier 5+ in my opinion. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics