Reply to Crown boundary study Option H

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Crown boundary study Option H"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Apologies if this has been covered but what happens to over crowded RM if there is no actual new school. They just stay overcrowded?  Or lB will just shrink considerably with the new magnet system so they will be ok?[/quote]
I asked this question a few pages back. In Option H, RM is suddenly at or under capacity.  Is that what MCPS is projecting?  Is this due to the regional models?

Can someone from MCPS please explain the change in projections?[/quote]

In [i]every[/i] option, including the originals, A through D, RM maintains its existing boundary and is projected to have a 2031-32 population of 1983 with a capacity of 2200.

Those 2031-32 projections are catchment-area ("resident students"), so they do not count out-of-catchment magnet students except where noted -- Poolesville collecting an additional 600 
 and Seneca Valley collecting 500, though how they apportioned the draw (removing those 600 and 500 from other schools) is unclear.  Perhaps they used current trends or perhaps they spread it proportionally to the projected resident student population of each school.  It doesn't appear that they have differential draw for the new regional magnet paradigm in these projections.[/quote]

That great.  Dri6ve by RM today and could not believe the number of portables![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics