Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I think many people forget MLSNext is not just MLS Academies. On the contrary, with tier 2 expansion the MLSN P2P clubs outnumber the academies. So MLSN can’t ditch P2P clubs’ interests (huge amount of money is coming from P2P clubs to MLSN). For a MLSN P2P it’s impossible to keep 2 age systems. Organization would be crazy. U12 and younger, plus the rest of older teams (non MLSN) will be playing SY … so I see unavoidable that MLSN P2P push for moving to SY. [/quote] P2P MLSN clubs vastly outnumbered Academies [i]before[/i] MLSN2 arrived. It is just, literally, another soccer league in a soup of them. Some of these people on here acting like these kids are all going pro and need to be grouped by BY because ('sans England') other countries group by BY (they do that because BY is also their school year cohorts) is wild. I know certain generations are susceptible to marketing but dang. Nothing would change if MLSN went SY or stayed BY. It would not change an iota. My god... [/quote] Why dont you just mind your own business and let people do what they want. Oh ya you know that if MLSN stays BY they will just ignore ECNL even more than they already do. Which will be really bad for boys ECNL.[/quote] I' m glad you think I have some sort of 'say' on what happens. Do you think the board of MLSN is here reading our posts and going, "hmmm. Anon#20232 had a really good point there, let's change to SY!"? Personally, I don't care if they change or not. My kid plays MLSN1 and I love the competition and strength of the league. [/quote] What month is your son? Maybe are you afraid that your boy won’t be a starter, or even not make his MLSN1 team, if MLSN1 moves to SY? Just asking …[/quote] I’ve been saying SY is the correct call for MLSN man. I don’t think a fractured system where two silos (BY/SY) have different age cutoffs benefits anyone but the leagues themselves. Boy, both sides of this debate are hella suspicious. [/quote] I agree on the suspicious part. The SY guy has made up correspondence with GA leadership and SOCAL leadership. Posted it on other soccer forums. Then referenced it here to try and make it seem official. The BY guy is saying wait for an official statement from the league before assuming MLSN + GA will change from BY to SY. Which one do you think is getting paid by the post to astroturf DCUM?[/quote] Both?[/quote] Paid to say "wait until an official statement"? Doesnt make sesne.[/quote] I’m one of those people saying wait for an official statement, and calling out “thatonedad”s fakery, and I’m a SY lady! I don’t know why it’s so hard to be normal on this thread.[/quote] You call him out on a forum that has nothing to do with his posts? Stop being a coward and if you think they are making it up call them out. Also what they posted isn’t really anything lie about? ECNL saying no changes for this year isn’t anything to make up? That’s just common knowledge at this point.[/quote] Nice try…. 🙄 Looks like you’re the same person posting on both. You know which post everyone is calling a fake, because as someone pointed out on both forums, the email exchange used two different fonts and font sizes. Just stop. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics