Reply to The DMV needs a YIMBY revolution

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "The DMV needs a YIMBY revolution "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]At some point you selfish NIMBYs need to get it through your thick skulls that America needs to GROW and [b]believe it or not we can build a school or two if necessary[/b]. Your obsession with your property values is obvious.[/quote]

Then please inform the “thick skulls” running Alexandria of this because they are apparently incapable of building new schools despite having the largest high school and two of the largest middle schools in the state.

But no, you won’t do that. You’ll just pretend that any concerns about your policies are immediately invalid.[/quote]

+1  I don't mind density.  I'm from NYC.  If someone wants to buy a close to metro house and knock it down and build a triplex, such is life.   But the urban planning that I've seen in Maryland in terms of inadequate planning for increased traffic and school overcrowding is just making it such that they're wrecking quality of life and our kids' educational future.[/quote]

They don’t care one bit.  Likely that they welcome it as they don’t like the very idea of suburbia.

Weird bike riding libertarians in Che Guevara tshirts, rooting for the bus as mass transit?  We are doomed.[/quote]

Of all the silly ideas in this thread, the idea that buses are not mass transit must be the silliest.[/quote]

Well, at least you admit that it’s just a bus, and not some magical super bus that people are actually going to use.  We’ve made some progress.

It’s mass transit in the same way a large enough donkey cart would be, but it don’t think that’s a good system on which base changes in zoning and parking requirements.[/quote]

Most people would rather have trains than buses to be sure.  But most people when considering costs and benefits, and the terrible track record of the Purple Line which has billions in overruns and nothing to show for it a decade later, would rather have a functioning bus rapid transit lane which is quick and still manages to move a lot of commuters.  I've seen it in several cities and it works well.[/quote]

While much of that is true none of that means that we should treat bus stops the same as metro stations in terms of density and targeted development subsidies.[/quote]

Good news! Nobody is proposing to do this! You can rest easy.[/quote]

Except you are lying.  The thrive plans turn BRT stops into metro stops in terms of density and incentives.[/quote]

Oh, BRT stations! I thought you were talking about bus stops.[/quote]
[b]
They're still bus stops and nothing more. [/b] The weird use of pretend language is the thing that turns people rabidly away from your ideas, gets you labeled as a crazy, and is why people say that you all lie all the tine [/quote]

Says someone who never takes any bus. Here is an explanation:

A [u]BUS STOP[/u] consists of a bus stop sign, on a pole, next to the road. In Montgomery County, there is also a concrete square for people to stand on. If you're lucky, there's a little wall you can sit on, and if you're super lucky, there's a whole bus shelter. There is probably no safe place to cross the street. There might be a sidewalk, or there might not be. There might be a streetlight near by, or it might be dark. If you use a wheelchair, you have to wait for the bus to kneel. When it's raining, passing drivers splash you with nasty street water.

A [u]BRT STATION[/u] has a platform, lighting, real-time bus arrival information, a ticket machine, and a shelter. There is a sidewalk. There is a safe place to cross the street. There is level boarding, or a ramp. There are, or are supposed to be, bus-only lanes, so that the bus drivers don't have to merge in and out of car traffic.

There! Now, next time this comes up, you don't have to sound ignorant or like you don't know what you're talking about.
[/quote]

Except for the dedicated lanes, this is what every bus stop should be, so you’re just describing bus stops. More density near bus stops along dedicated lanes makes sense. [/quote]

It might be what every bus stop should be, but it is unfortunately not what every bus stop is. So it is actually not a description of a bus stop.[/quote]

It is a place where a bus stops. That means it’s a bus stop. If you’re saying it’s only BRT if it has dedicated lanes, then I agree. Everything else is a not really mass transit. [b]It’s transportation of last resort[/b]. [/quote]

What an ignorant comment.

For me, a car and bicycle owner, the bus is my first choice for some destinations, just as Metro is for other destinations.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics