Reply to Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Apparently Musk is having some kind of psychological break.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1526246899606601730?s=21&t=tjZvLNxhFAQIAzY1WlJmFA[/twitter][/quote]

You’re implying that this a break from normal for him. Not only is this normal for him, using a poop emoji to reply the CEO of the company you’re trying to buy during an ongoing negotiation, on a platform you’re negotiating for, is hilarious. I know it’s DC and everyone is uptight around here, but still… [/quote]

It's not hilarious. It's unhinged.[/quote]

Elon is married to Grimes, named one of his children X Æ A-Xii, said he would take Tesla private at 420 a share (a pot reference for you DC squares), and smoked a joint live on air with Joe Rogan while musing about aliens and DMT. Dropping a poop emoji a week after he said he was going to take over Coca Cola so that he could put cocaine back in the soft drink was not him having a “psychological break.” It’s him acting like he always has. And apparently it’s worked. When the uptight naysayers on here revolutionize the electric vehicle industry and secure government space flight contracts maybe they can scoff at his behavior. But he’s such a game changing figure because of this type of behavior. If he wasn’t the character he’s always been he’d probably be right here with you and I tossing barbs from the sideline while we rake in a safe salary at our boring jobs.

Where were all of these criticisms years ago when he was making Teslas? It’s so odd that people just started turning on him when he wanted to take over Twitter and not be so censorious. A lot of people are very afraid of not having the final say over who gets to say what on social media and it’s very telling.[/quote]

He’s not married to Grimes.

He’s an unpredictable nut. It’s one thing for an unpredictable nut to build a car company. It’s another to run an important platform. 
[/quote]

I agree! This is why all social media platforms should be reclassified as public utilities and all speech on there should be regulated by a government entity that is abiding by an impartial legal framework, which is adjudicated in the court system. That means if Hunter’s laptop stories are banned, so are pee tape stories. Users should only lose their rights to post when they break existing laws or are banned after a court hearing.

These platforms are much too important to be operated by people who aren’t bound by any regulations.[/quote]

Agree.

And bring back the Fairness Doctrine. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics