Reply to Barr and Durham

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr and Durham"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Because, yeah, no corruption in the Dem party  :roll:  [b]This particular indictment is significant.[/b] Kind of weak, given it’s so late in the game, but make no mistake, there are democrats involved in all this, getting very nervous. As eager as Dems were to get out the Mueller Report, don’t expect the same eagerness with Durham’s. Expect a huge push to hide it from the public.[/quote]

[i]Addressing the accusation on Friday morning, attorney Toobin admitted he found the charge bizarre and likely to fall apart under further scrutiny, while Jarrett noted that Durham spent five years and came up almost empty-handed.

"I think counselor Jarrett gave a very accurate description of the charges here," Toobin began. "But, if I can just add how weird this case is and how unusual even this case is. First of all, Sussman isn't charged with lying to an FBI agent. He's charged with voluntarily going to a lawyer at the FBI, the top lawyer Jim Baker, and describing what might be a crime and saying you should look into this."[/i]

https://www.rawstory.com/john-durham-2655054134/

It's only significance is how partisan it looks for several years of an investigation that basically turned up nothing. Compare it to the Mueller investigation which was cut short and had far more impact against criming.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics