Reply to new Reade/Biden thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]80 pages on the other thread and 44 plus here doesn't matter.  What matters is that oral sex isnt sex.[/quote]

And what Biden is accused of isn’t sex either.  End of story.[/quote]

I disagree, it’s sexual harassment by someone in power, even if it doesn’t meet some state’s formal definition of “rape.” Donnie the Groper has done similar things dozens of times in much better documented allegations, and I think we can all agree it’s vile.

But I doubt Biden did it. Reade has changed her story too many times and her corroboration doesn’t back her up very well. I doubt The NY Times, with its call for an investigation of the Delaware files, thinks anything will turn up there, either. They just want to put this matter to rest before November, so they can fairly turn their big guns on Trump’s 24 allegations.

This thread is totally useful for ... airing and debunking the claims against Biden. I’ve learned a lot from you guys re the new accusation that lasted all of 3 hours on Saturday (what was her name again?). Re the Reade defrauding and robbing the pregnant horse non-profit. Re Reade editing her 2019 Medium post 2 days before she came out with her different 2020 allegations. Re Reade now claiming Biden’s office fired her although she had earlier said she left because her boyfriend “pleaded” with her to join him in the Midwest.

Keep this thread open and keep this useful stuff coming![/quote]

Let's assume Biden "harassed" her - that isn't rape and that isn't assault. Also this was after the Clarence Thomas hearings, which Biden started apologizing for almost immediately after and at the time in 1993, was leading the charge towards legislation and rules around benefiting women on this issue. The context just seems like the timing would be ridiculously bizarre for this to have taken place as Reade describes it.

Reade's story falls apart because she has changed it so many times. The pantyhose thing was discussed already, but there is no world where a sitting senator in 1993 fingers an aid in a public hallway.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics