Reply to new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Running around a party with your pants down is exposing yourself. People get arrested for this.

Kavanaugh apologists are bottom feeders.
[/quote]

Agree.  Making up stories like this is worse.  Again, there is no corroboration.  This all started with the Ramirez story.  Even she couldn't be sure it was Kavanaugh until after she spent six days talking to her lawyer.  No one else could corroborate it.   The only people who said it happened were not there when it happened.  Kind of weak accusation.

[i]Does it not bother you that false accusations could take you down?[/quote][b]

No, it bothers me that there was not a real investigation with an expansive scope so a bare majority of an institution that represents a minority of the country could push someone onto the Court for a lifetime appointment.  To say nothing of his sniveling, pathetic, partisan rant, shady finances, and apparent perjury, which are all reasons to not confirm him INDEPENDENTLY of the allegations.

Not getting a SCOTUS appointment is not "being taken down."  If he had shown any humility while maintaining his innocence, people might feel a lot differently about him.  But no he is a saint and we are all Clinton apologists.  This will make the GOP lose the Senate ultimately.

[/quote]

He’s been investigated six times. He’s clean. Keep trying to get him though. It’s very entertaining to watch the hysteria blow up in your faces.[/quote]
You’re confusing background checks for investigations.[/quote]

It's called a background INVESTIGATION.   And, the FBI conducted yet another investigation after these bogus allegations were leveled.  So did the Senate Judiciary Committee.  
Result:  NADA
Move on.  [/quote]

LOL. Guess you aren’t familiar with “background investigations”. NONE of this would come up. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics